Glasgow Legal Principle (GLT) is likely one of the largest academic items in Europe and the UK devoted to research and teaching in legal idea broadly construed. It has been steered, as an example, that constitutional patriotism won’t provide a plausible model of social integration for worldwide organisations such because the EU. In this essay, I’ll provide an outline of the idea and a choice of its critiques.
The present work, based mostly on a Course given at The Hague Academy of International Law within the Summer time 2007, identifies the philosophical postulates that underlie this subject of research and reveals their profound coherence and the practical consequences that follow from these postulates within the resolution of international disputes.
It concludes that, although students (and particularly legal scholars) can not divorce themselves from the world, their aim ought to be to bend their audiences to their view of the reality, slightly than to shape their output to the perceived truths of their audiences.
Beyond perennial issues of the quality of empirical proof and the flexibility of authorized actors to use it, there are more elementary issues: Using empirical proof focuses consideration on the outcomes of legal guidelines, discouraging a debate about contested and competing values.